Well I acctully have some members which is a shock in itself but not just one. As I am writing I have 9 members! Those wonderful, wonderful people are: David Holmes, Kelly, Sarah A, Wellman, Justine Wilmott, Allana, Sarah D, Scott and me. Each and everyone of them heros.
My target for this week is to buy the Woking program which I am acctully in and get through the week without any major embarassment.
Word.
ReplyDeleteUnless you're a newly hatched pod person, you already know that you can observe a definite bias in Mr. Daniel Whitby's personal attacks relating to what I call larcenous skinflints. But let me add that Whitby expects people to bow and scrape before him. As a preliminary, I want to put Whitby's beer-guzzling flimflams out to pasture. Despite some perceptions to the contrary, I can't follow his pretzel logic. I do, however, know that of all of Whitby's exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands out: "Children should belong to the state." I don't know where he came up with this, but his statement is dead wrong.
ReplyDeleteWhitby is totally mephitic, as he has proved to my complete satisfaction. Although there's no denying that his memoranda have a tremendous infiltrating force and a serious degenerative power, it may be somewhat more controversial to allege that there is no excuse for the innumerable errors of fact, the slovenly and philistine artistic judgments, the historical ineptitude, the internal contradictions, and the various half-truths, untruths, and gussied-up truths that litter every one of Whitby's essays from the first word to the last. All in all, Whitby wants to sugarcoat the past and dispense false optimism for the future. Personally, I don't want that. Personally, I prefer freedom. If you also prefer freedom then you should be working with me to protect our peace, privacy, and safety.
I have to wonder where Whitby got the idea that it is my view that everyone who doesn't share his beliefs is a raucous dopehead deserving of death and damnation. This sits hard with me because it is simply not true and I've never written anything to imply that it is. I surely feel that he has insulted everyone with even the slightest moral commitment. Whitby obviously has none or he wouldn't keep a close eye on those who look like they might think an unapproved thought. I should note that I respect the English language and believe in the use of words as a means of communication. Mudslinging, illaudable usurers like him, however, consider spoken communication as merely a set of noises uttered to excite emotions in the worst types of counter-productive Machiavellians there are in order to convince them to denigrate and discard all of Western culture.
Whitby keeps trying to open the floodgates of fetishism. And if we don't remain eternally vigilant, he will truly succeed. No one that I speak with or correspond with is happy about this situation. Of course, I don't speak or correspond with harebrained, resentful miscreants, Whitby's devotees, or anyone else who fails to realize that we must debate the efficacy of Whitby's nettlesome, noxious subliminal psywar campaigns. This call to action begins with you. You must be the first to champion the force of goodness against the greed of prissy apostates. You must be the one to reveal the nature and activity of Whitby's proxies and expose their inner contexts as well as their ultimate final aims. And you must inform your fellow man that in a rather infamous speech, Whitby exclaimed that we're supposed to shut up and smile when he says abominable things. (I edited out the rest of what he said because, well, it didn't really say anything.)
Whitby's antics have merged with fanaticism in several interesting ways. Both spring from the same kind of reality-denying mentality. Both promote the mean-spirited warnings of delirious prevaricators. And both pervert human instincts by suppressing natural, feral constraints and encouraging abnormal patterns of behavior. Like fire, Whitby is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. Think about it, and I'm sure you'll agree with me.
What kind of loser wants to keep essential documents hidden from the public until they become politically moot? A loser like Whitby. He has, at times, called me "avaricious" or "paltry". Such contemptuous name-calling has passed far beyond the stage of being infantile but harmless. It has the capacity to monopolize the press.
What we're seeing is a domino effect of events that started with Whitby stating that his proposed social programs epitomize wholesome family entertainment. That prevarication incited his comrades to test another formula for silencing serious opposition. What I call uneducated hoodlums reacted, in turn, by preventing me from sleeping soundly at night. The next domino to fall, not surprisingly, was a widespread increase in revisionism, and that's the event that galvanized me to tell everyone that at the heart of the problem is Whitby's obliviousness to history, his moral cowardice masked in bold rhetoric, and his overwhelmingly shallow political posturing. This is equivalent to saying that when a mistake is made, the smart thing to do is to admit it and reverse course. That takes real courage. The way that Whitby stubbornly refuses to own up to his mistakes serves only to convince me that I correctly predicted that he would overthrow the government and eliminate the money system. Alas, I didn't think he'd do that so effectively—or so soon.
I am not a robot. I am a thinking, feeling, human being. As such, I get teary-eyed whenever I see Whitby open new avenues for the expression of hate. It makes me want to view the realms of jujuism and mysticism not as two opposing poles but as two continua, which is why I'm so eager to tell you that I hate it when people get their facts completely wrong. For instance, whenever I hear some corporate fat cat make noises about how everything Whitby says is utterly and absolutely true, I can't help but think that some sick, unctuous scroungers actually insist that it is evil to question Whitby's equivocations. This is the kind of muddled thinking that Whitby is encouraging with his stances. Even worse, all those who raise their voice against this brainwashing campaign are denounced as self-pitying, callow wimps. That's just one side of the coin. The other side is that I've known some yutzes who were impressively sappy. However, Whitby is poxy and that trumps sappy every time.
It is not uncommon for Whitby to victimize the innocent, penalize the victim for making any effort to defend himself, and then paint the whole invidious affair as some great benefit to humanity. He maintains a "Big Brother" dossier of personal information about everyone he distrusts, to use as a potential weapon. Is your name listed in that dossier? On the surface, it would seem to have something to do with the way that his prank phone calls are a mockery of all that is fair and equitable. But upon further investigation one will find that Whitby keeps missing my point. More specifically, he keeps getting hung up on my words without seeing the underlying meaning. For example, when I say that cowardice, irresponsibility, and hooliganism are inextricably wedded in Whitby's wisecracks, Whitby seems incapable of realizing that what I'm really getting at is that the whole of his revolting worldview may perhaps be expressed in one simple word. That word is "autism". Let me explain: Whitby looks primarily at a person's superficial qualities such as physiognomy and mannerisms. I, in contrast, consider how likely a person is to begin the debate about Whitby's politics. That's what's important to me. Either way, I could make a long argument for the idea that people should just treat each other with decency and respect. So let him call me merciless. I call him hostile.
Whitby lusts for a world in which overbearing disdainful-types concentrate all the wealth of the world into Whitby's own hands, but I guess nobody ever explained that to Whitby's bootlickers. His intimates perpetrate all kinds of atrocities while alleging that they are simply not capable of such activities and that therefore, the atrocities must be the product of my and your feverish and overworked imaginations. Others may disagree but I believe that the impact of his homicidal shell games is exactly that predicted by the Book of Revelation. Evil will preside over the land. Injustice will triumph over justice, chaos over order, futility over purpose, superstition over reason, and lies over truth. Only when humanity experiences this Hell on Earth will it fully appreciate that we can divide Whitby's fulminations into three categories: rotten, brown-nosing, and self-righteous. Until we address this issue, we will never move beyond it.
dont hold back
ReplyDelete:)
ReplyDeleteAbove. Most beautifully written thing ever.
ReplyDelete"Children should belong to the state."
And they shall become the common treasury of all.
Kibbutz, everyone...